What is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)?
Better known as "AHP", pronouncing each letter ("A" -- "H" -- "P"), this decision structuring tool is well-known in operations research circles. Approximately 25 years ago, Tom Saaty developed an approach for prioritizing and ranking alternatives (cf., Saaty, 1977). My first exposure to Saaty's ideas occurred in 1981 when I read his practitioner-oriented book titled "The Analytical Hierarchy Process". The AHP has been used extensively since it was proposed.
Ed Wasil (
So what is AHP? AHP is a multicriteria decision technique that can combine qualitative and quantitative factors for prioritizing, ranking and evaluating alternatives. The first step in AHP is to develop a hierarchical representation of a problem. At the top of the hierarchy is the overall objective and the decision alternatives are at the bottom. Between the top and bottom levels are the relevant attributes of the decision problem for comparing alternatives. The number of levels in the hierarchy depends on the complexity of the problem and the decision maker's model of the problem hierarchy. Once the hierarchical representation is identified, one generates relational data for comparing the alternatives. Then one determines the relative priority of each attribute using the comparisons. Finally, one calculates the priorities or weights of the lowest level alternatives relative to the top-most objective. The AHP uses paired comparisons to develop the prioritization. This simple, intuitive approach of comparing alternatives limits the cognitive demand on the decision maker and provides a means for checking the consistency of the comparisons.
A number of software packages implement AHP. The best known and most widely used is still Expert Choice. Ernest Forman (
So is AHP a DSS? No, AHP is a theory of how prioritization or ranking decisions should be made. The software Expert Choice has become more sophisticated in the implementation of its user interface over the years, but the underlying theory remains the same. Expert Choice can be used for special decision support studies and it can be used for creating a decision support system. The analytical hierarchy created in Expert Choice can be used to support ranking tasks like rank ordering the importance of military targets, the quality of research proposals or the quality of investment proposals.
At DSSResources.COM, you can find a case study using Expert Choice by John Wasyluk and Dan Saaty titled "Developing a Portfolio Approach to Capital Investment: A Case Study in Re-Engineering Resource Allocation at the U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs". The case describes the use of Team Expert Choice to support the capital investment process at the U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs. "The decision model was delivered to the project evaluation team on a laptop with radio frequency keypads to enable the team to efficiently rate each project against the objectives to which it contributed. The software allowed decision makers to use both quantitative and qualitative information to rate competing investments".
Congratulations to Tom Saaty and good wishes to all of the people at Expert Choice, Inc. I strongly recommend that readers visit www.expertchoice.com.
Forman, E. H. and M. A. Selly, Decision by Objectives: How to Convince Others That You Are Right, World Scientific Publishing Company, December 2001.
Saaty, T., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, 1977, pp. 234-281.
Saaty, T., The Analytical Hierarchy Process,
Wasil, E. and B. Golden, "Celebrating 25 years of AHP-based decision making," (editorial), Computers & Operations Research, vol. 30, issue 10, Sept. 2003, pp. 1419-1420.
Wasyluk, O. John, and Daniel Saaty, "Developing a Portfolio Approach to Capital Investment: A Case Study in Re-Engineering Resource Allocation at the U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs", Expert Choice, Inc., 2001, posted at DSSResources.COM
The above response is from Power, D., What is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)? DSS News, Vol. 4, No. 13,
Last update: 2005-08-07 11:19
Author: Daniel Power
You cannot comment on this entry